Friday, 21 November 2008
Sydney Biodiesel Users Group
  Home arrow Blog arrow Biodiesel Lubricity  
Main Menu
Home
Member Profiles
FAQs
Forum
News
Links
Blog
Contact Us
Search
News Feeds
Announcements
Photos
Biodiesel Lubricity PDF Print E-mail
Written by Terry Shulze   
Saturday, 24 September 2005
By Terry Shulze

The lubrication that biodiesel provides to petroleum based diesel is conceptually known as “lubricity”. Lubricity should not be confused with viscosity, or the thickness of a lubricant. Viscosity will provide a fluid wedge to prevent metal on metal contact, lubricity is provided by components in the fuel that prevent wear on contacting surfaces.

To our knowledge, research on the superior lubrication properties of Biodiesel has not been conducted down to the molecular level, however, there are many empirical reports complied from research conducted by reputable organizations that graphically demonstrate the lubricity qualities of biodiesel.

There are a number of standard empirical tests used throughout the fuels and lubrication field.  The two most widely used tests are the “High-Frequency Reciprocating Rig” (HFRR) and the “Scuffing Load Ball on Cylinder Lubricity Evaluator” (SLBOCLE). These two tests are do not rely upon theory, but seek to quantify the actual ability of a lubricant to prevent wear. Both tests are currently balloted by the American Society for Testing and Materials.

The Engine Manufactures Association has established a specification of lubricity in diesel fuels. That specification calls for a minimum loading of 3100grams under the SBOCLE test and a maximum of wear of 450 microns under the HFRR test. When mandated low-sulfur diesel of the California Air Resources Board was tested it was found that number 2 (#2) diesel can pass the BOCLE test, but number 1 (#1) failed the test. Significantly, both #1 and #2 failed the HFRR test.

Tests have been performed using biodiesel and other lubricity additives. Of the additives only “Centex” was able to enhance the lubricity enough to pass all tests. The other additives “Farmland”, “Unichem” and “Petrolite” passed the BOCLE test and the #2 HFRR test, but failed the #1 HFRR test. “Octel” failed both #1 and #2 tests. Biodiesel was able to meet all tests when blended at 2%.

It should be noted that just .75% biodiesel in #1 or #2 diesel provides equipment protection superior to the lubricity additives (excepting for “Centex”). More importantly, just .05% biodiesel will provide the necessary lubrication for both #2 diesel and JP-8.
 
The base stock used in making biodiesel, as well as the alcohol used in production affects the lubricity of the biodiesel. However, all biodiesel will provide the required lubricity for both #1 and #2 ultra low sulfur diesel (also Jet A and JP-8) when blended at 2% by volume.

 
< Prev

Sydney Biodiesel Users Group is a site dedicated to helping the biodiesel community in Sydney, NSW, Australia. We provide a place to share information freely among our members and to the Australian public.
We aim to raise public and government awareness of biodiesel and assist the local scene, while promoting the use of biodiesel and waste or used vegetable oil as an alternative fuel for transport.
We also provide a place for Sydney users to discuss biodiesel and SVO/WCO conversions in our biofuels web forum. Of course other Australian users are also welcome.
We ask no membership fees, donations or sponsorship - it is free to all. We welcome contibution from all members, be they enthusiasts or industry. Please enjoy your time here and help promote biodiesel in Sydney and in Australia.